Paul Strand Misses the point completely

An article over at CBN by Paul Strand has this to say about the American Humanist Association’s Newest, and Biggest Ad Campaign, Consider Humanism

In the past, the group’s campaign was more subtle, with simple messages like, “No God, No Problem.”

But the latest string of commercials, billboards and print ads takes scriptures about subjects such as smiting, slavery and women’s submission, and uses them negatively.

*Emphasis Mine

I don’t think he realizes that all of those things are viewed as big negatives nowadays.  Hopefully he’ll realize that slavery and misogyny have no place in today’s world. Truly, I’m not surprised by this as it is CBN.


Supplement My Ethnicity?

Someone in my Family recently sent me this link to  MiGenetics this vitamin/supplement site that said that most of our unhealthiness is based upon use not eating the foods that our ethnicity is used to eating.

Just taking a look at their website under the benefits section lists like 15-20 different things that are all basically unrelated that it says it helps with, that’s a tip-off to me to say that doesn’t really sound plausible, As well as them saying things like our genes determine our nutrition. While evolution may have made it easier for some ethnic groups to get more nutrients out of some foods than others it doesn’t mean we’re lacking in nutrients as the site implies.  The adaptations to process more nutrients by some ethnic groups than others most likely makes up for a lack of a supply of that nutrient that another ethnicity had.  And even those adaptations are most likely not there as the culture will most likely adapt their food supplies/what they eat, to make up for the lack of those nutrients before evolution will kick in.  A good example of this would be Indian culture. Since most meats are not used as food there, they’ve made up for their lack of protein they receive in their diet by eating lentils,beans,etc. to make up for it.  This doesn’t mean that their nutritional needs are not being met any better or worse than any other culture’s.  When you look at the incidents for disease rates and take into account the skewed nature of things such as the level of medical care, prevention efforts, etc.  most health issues seems to fall along a nice Bell Curve, in that they’re pretty evenly distributed when you take those factors into account.  In fact most of the health issues listed that they claim their supplement can cure can be directly related to how many calories a person consumes and their overall weight.  Such as this recent item, a professor lost 26 lbs eating Twinkies for meals but while he did so, limited his caloric intake to 1800 calories a day instead of the 2600 calories a day in a balanced diet, when he lost the weight his overall health had improved significantly.  Not only did his lipids, and triglycerides drop the doctors said that his good cholesterol went up and his bad cholesterol went down. This would tend to violate the hypothesis put forth by this site that their supplement would  and most of the common understanding of “eating Healthy”.  you can check out the info on this more at CNN, and on the benefits of just eating less.

Another big tip-off that this product is basically a sham is that under their research page has no mention of the scientific journal they’re product has supposedly been studied in, if this thing was as amazing as it says it is, they’d definitely list any/all scientific journals they’re product had been in.  Looking at the ingredients for the European Version of this, it looks like it is nothing more than your standard multi-vitamin with a few things switched around to make it fit for their description of ethnic groups.  The good old consumer adage, “If it sounds to good to be true, it probably is” applies here I’d say, probably something better to do than order something like this would be to follow Michael Pollon’s advice from the New York Times Magazine, “Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants.”

ACLU to Represent Mayfield, KY Muslims

In Mayfield, Ky a local group of Muslims was recently denied a zoning permit for them to use a spot in a strip mall as a mosque.  Originally the zoning board approved the permit but after public outcry, the decision was revoked.  Another meeting was arranged so the public could comment on record,however when a representative from the Muslim community arrived to make the Muslim community’s case , he was turned away at the door because the room was full of all other locals, many if not all of them opposed to the plan. The permit was denied due to “inadequate parking”, the allocated space for the rented section of the strip mall only had 6 spaces. You can read more about the decision via the local NPR station.

Thankfully the ACLU has taken up the case:

The American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU of Kentucky have agreed to represent Khadar Ahmed, a resident of Mayfield, Kentucky, who was denied a permit last month by the Mayfield Board of Zoning Adjustment to operate a Muslim worship center in the town’s central business district.

Michael Aldridge, Executive Director of the ACLU of Kentucky [said,] “The fact that Mr. Ahmed was initially granted a permit and then had it taken away without there being any change in circumstances is troubling.”

“Preventing any group from freely practicing their faith is unlawful and contrary to core American values,” said Daniel Mach, Director of the ACLU Program on Freedom of Religion and Belief. “While we remain open to alternative avenues of resolution, governmental actions that have the effect of denying individuals the right to practice their religion must be challenged.”

Hopefully the local Mayfield Government will realize that they made a huge mistake and will do the right thing before they cost themselves and the citizens of Mayfield lots of money in a legal battle.

Blake Mycoskie founder of TOMS Shoes Speaks at Murray State

Blake Mycoskie is the founder of Tom’s shoes, and he’s been visiting campuses around the country telling the story of TOMS Shoes.  TOMS Shoes is a Shoe Company based in California that started up about 4 years ago after their founder was in Argentina and gave away some shoes for kids in a local village.   After that Blake Mycoskie decide he wanted to keep helping these kids so he came up with the idea to sell 250 pairs of shoes in the US and for each pair sold there he’d give away a pair to kids in a village that didn’t have shoes.

Blake started his company in his apartment and sold 80 shoes to a designer store in LA and then the LA Times published an article about his project and he sold 2200 shoes the day the story ran. Since then TOMS Shoes has grown hugely and is about to give away its 1 millionth pair of shoes to a child who has none.  Blake made mention several times of how his business has grown simply by word of mouth due to people feeling good for buying these shoes.

This leads us to the question if Blake’s idea of buy one give one works with shoes then what else can it work for? Medical Prescriptions? Vaccines? Food? Water?  The possibilities are endless and I hope they all take off like TOMS has, who knows maybe I might try to tackle something like this.

Questions for you…

I have to work with several of our customers who we supply software for. Some of the institutions we supply are overtly religious, and offer “Christ Centered Teachings” from a “Christian World View”.  Many times when working with these customers I must endure them making overtly religious statements to myself, as well as listening to their phone system’s messages that tell all about how Christian they are. Most of the time I’ll simply brush off their annoying messages about living with God, and Blessing me over the holiday’s and such.  Sometimes I get the feeling, that since I don’t return these sentiments, I am fed even more the next time I must deal with them.  They don’t know I’m an atheist but I’m starting to think if they did I might end up getting even more of these “well wishes”.

How do you deal with customers who proselytize to you while at work?

Does your work place have a secular work policy, as in no religion while at work?

Pat Robertson is a douche…

I was flicking through the tv last night and saw this story about people protesting a mosque going up in an old Burlington Coat Factory, in NYC.  The reason this is news you might ask?  The mosque is going in two-blocks from the site of the World Trade Center.

Since this was a CBN Broadcast any opposing viewpoint never even made it into the piece. The only side of the opposing view was a shot of the man trying to build the mosque, Feisal Abdul Rauf,who (according to a quick google search) works on fostering better understanding between the West and the Muslim community. Looks like these protesters want none of that.

This is what ole Pat had to say after the report finished,

“I feel it is an abomination to build a Muslim sign of Triumph at the ruins of the grave site of 3000 brave Americans.   I just think it’s something that’s terrible. I think it’s something that shouldn’t be done and I think Mayor Bloomberg should have better sense; that he and the city council of New York should say no.”

Like it or not Pat the same freedom that lets you spout your nonsense on air like this applies to *shock* other people too.  Those same freedoms that let you keep worship how you want and where you want also apply to Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists, Sikhs, Jews, Pagans, and non-believers.  Just because you think your way is the best doesn’t give you the right to take away other’s freedoms.  And until you understand that you’ll always be a douche Pat.

While I haven’t really heard much on the man behind the mosque, I do happen to think having a mosque so close to the site of the WTC disaster would do some good.  Fostering a better understanding between Non-Muslim Americans and Muslims is something we all could benefit from.  And while I’m not particularly fond of any religion, and criticize anything that is morally unacceptable (looking at you Islam & Christianity), I think learning about what defines people can help us lead to a healthy dialogue.   I for one hope they get the mosque and Muslim Community Center up and going soon, it would make a wonderful trip to complement a visit to the WTC Memorial that’s due to open 9/11/2011.

What do you think? Is putting this up near the former WTC a good idea or bad one?

President Obama goes after the Ugandan anti-homosexuality bill

At the National Prayer breakfast this morning President Obama made some comments on The Ugandan anti-homosexuality bill.

“We may disagree about gay marriage, but surely we can agree that it is unconscionable to target gays and lesbians for who they are — whether it’s here in the United States or … more extremely in odious laws that are being proposed most recently in Uganda,”

This was in response to the Ugandan anti-homosexuality bill that would put punishments on gays, lesbians, and  transgendered people.  The punishments range from life imprisonment to death for those that practice that kind of lifestyle. This bill which was being pushed by  The Family.  The Family aka The Fellowship aka The Foundation is a secretive group for politicians and other high-ranking officials to go around and practice their Bible studies and general god talk.  They’re members include,Rep. John Ensign and former Gov. Mark  Sanford.

The best part of this however is that President Obama made these remarks at The Family’s sponsored event, The National Prayer Breakfast.  I really was disappointed that the President was actually going to attend the event, however this makes it a little better.  I still think that him going constitutes a violation of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.  How is going to a Christian Prayer service, while bringing other heads of state, not saying that “Hey yeah the government likes this religion”?

Hopefully next year will be different and Mr. Obama will stay back and start to distance himself from events like these, or at least maybe attend a Secular Humanist Breakfast?